What If Your Emails Never Went to Gmail and Twitter Couldn’t See Your Tweets?

A new tool under development by Oregon State computer scientists could radically alter the way that communications work on the web. Privly is a sort of manifesto-in-code, a working argument for a more private, less permanent Internet. 

The system we have now gives all the power to the service providers. That seemed to be necessary, but Privly shows that it is not: Users could have a lot more power without giving up social networking. Just pointing that out is a valuable contribution to the ongoing struggle to understand and come up with better ways of sharing and protecting ourselves online. 

“Companies like Twitter, Google, and Facebook make you choose between modern technology and privacy. But the Privly developers know this to be false choice,” lead dev Sean McGregor says in the video below. “You can communicate through the site of your choosing without giving the host access to your content.”

Through browser extensions, Privly allows you to post to social networks and send email without letting those services see “into” your text. Instead, your actual words get encrypted and then routed to Privlys servers (or an eventual peer-to-peer network). What the social media site “sees” is merely a link that Privly expands in your browser into the full content. Of course, this requires that people who want to see your content also need Privly installed on their machines.

Read more.

1. sugashane reblogged this from lalibertarienne and added:

   How one Priv.ly is making your private info private again.

2. somereply reblogged this from quadrillion
3. hermannview reblogged this from freeusapress and added:

   Is this the way of the future? Maybe privacy can be better protected…

4. tattoos-news likes this
5. lotsoloot reblogged this from theatlantic
6. truise reblogged this from observedintoexistence
7. rummagingwizard reblogged this from mmanal
8. rummagingwizard likes this
9. mmanal reblogged this from theatlantic
10. techiebros reblogged this from theatlantic
11. humboldtoctober reblogged this from theatlantic
12. that-lunatic-slytherin likes this
13. kellyohsully likes this
14. coffeeatmidnight reblogged this from theatlantic
15. mostafahussien likes this
16. sherileturner reblogged this from theatlantic
17. sea-immortalis reblogged this from theatlantic
18. pod313 reblogged this from theatlantic
19. oisel likes this
20. paulquzz reblogged this from freeusapress
21. paulquzz likes this
22. the-nomadic-writer likes this
23. conceiteddaydreamer reblogged this from theatlantic
24. hisnamewasbeanni reblogged this from world-shaker and added:

    So, instead of revealing our tweets/posts/emails/blogs to the individually relevant sites, we’d be revealing all of...

25. dcy3 reblogged this from theatlantic
26. copsrfagz reblogged this from theatlantic
27. hermannview likes this
28. resmc reblogged this from cooledskin
29. littlebitmore likes this
30. freeusapress reblogged this from theatlantic
31. itsdds reblogged this from emergentfutures
32. osirisemanpoure reblogged this from world-shaker
33. osirisemanpoure likes this
34. radoration reblogged this from futurejournalismproject and added:

    *Pretty clever. If it works I am all for it.

35. screen--agers likes this
36. brosophila likes this
37. qenitalia likes this
38. fischee likes this
39. hdoubleg likes this
40. elviajedelaesperanza reblogged this from theatlantic
41. weirdsociology likes this
42. buttoninfatuation likes this
43. ilovedeers likes this
44. sinshine reblogged this from sexgenderbody
45. sol--sum likes this
46. speakgirl reblogged this from sexgenderbody
47. princechiot reblogged this from sexgenderbody
48. ehlerslalos reblogged this from world-shaker
49. payslipgig likes this
50. Show more notesLoading...