April 11, 2012
The Creepiness Factor: How Obama and Romney Are Getting to Know You

Inside microtargeting offices in Washington and across the nation, individual voters are today coming through in HDTV clarity — every single digitally-active American consumer, which is 91 percent of us, according to Pew Internet research. Political strategists buy consumer information from data brokers, mash it up with voter records and online behavior, then run the seemingly-mundane minutiae of modern life — most-visited websites, which soda’s in the fridge — through complicated algorithms and: pow! They know with “amazing” accuracy not only if, but why, someone supports Barack Obama or Romney, says Willie Desmond of Strategic Telemetry, which works for the Obama reelection campaign.
Entertaining and baffling discoveries abound. For example: Soda seems to count a great deal. Diet Dr. Pepper evidently indicates a Republican who votes, while apathetic Democrats drink 7up, according to National Media Research Planning & Placement. Beer, too, matters. Relatively uninterested Republicans go for Busch Light. Additional findings reveal that the most politically-motivated Republicans visit foxnews.com (no surprise there) while Democrats who couldn’t care less attend mtv.com or scour dating websites (OK: no surprise there, too).
All of these online movements contribute to what pollster Alex Gage calls “data exhaust.” Email, Amazon orders, resume uploads, tweets — especially tweets — cough out fumes that microtargeters or data brokers suck up to mold hyper-specific messaging. We’ve been hurled into an era of “Big Data,” Gage said. In the last eight years the amount of information slopped up by firms like his, which sell information to politicians, has tripled, from 300 distinct bits on each voter in 2004 to more than 900 today. We have the rise of social media and mobile technology to thank for this.
Dowd put microtargeting’s evolution this way: “It’s scary.” Even scarier? Most Americans don’t know how the profiling works. And when they’re informed, as many as 86 percent of Americans want it to stop, calling it an invasion of privacy, according to a 2009 survey, “Americans Reject Tailored Advertising,” by a scholarly consortium. Pew released a report last month corroborating the findings: Nearly three-fourths of Americans say they don’t want their online presence followed, even if it does lead to more personalized ads.
Read more. [Image: National Media Research Planning & Placement]

Who knew that Democrats love Extreme Makeover: Home Edition?

The Creepiness Factor: How Obama and Romney Are Getting to Know You

Inside microtargeting offices in Washington and across the nation, individual voters are today coming through in HDTV clarity — every single digitally-active American consumer, which is 91 percent of us, according to Pew Internet research. Political strategists buy consumer information from data brokers, mash it up with voter records and online behavior, then run the seemingly-mundane minutiae of modern life — most-visited websites, which soda’s in the fridge — through complicated algorithms and: pow! They know with “amazing” accuracy not only if, but why, someone supports Barack Obama or Romney, says Willie Desmond of Strategic Telemetry, which works for the Obama reelection campaign.

Entertaining and baffling discoveries abound. For example: Soda seems to count a great deal. Diet Dr. Pepper evidently indicates a Republican who votes, while apathetic Democrats drink 7up, according to National Media Research Planning & Placement. Beer, too, matters. Relatively uninterested Republicans go for Busch Light. Additional findings reveal that the most politically-motivated Republicans visit foxnews.com (no surprise there) while Democrats who couldn’t care less attend mtv.com or scour dating websites (OK: no surprise there, too).

All of these online movements contribute to what pollster Alex Gage calls “data exhaust.” Email, Amazon orders, resume uploads, tweets — especially tweets — cough out fumes that microtargeters or data brokers suck up to mold hyper-specific messaging. We’ve been hurled into an era of “Big Data,” Gage said. In the last eight years the amount of information slopped up by firms like his, which sell information to politicians, has tripled, from 300 distinct bits on each voter in 2004 to more than 900 today. We have the rise of social media and mobile technology to thank for this.

Dowd put microtargeting’s evolution this way: “It’s scary.” Even scarier? Most Americans don’t know how the profiling works. And when they’re informed, as many as 86 percent of Americans want it to stop, calling it an invasion of privacy, according to a 2009 survey, “Americans Reject Tailored Advertising,” by a scholarly consortium. Pew released a report last month corroborating the findings: Nearly three-fourths of Americans say they don’t want their online presence followed, even if it does lead to more personalized ads.

Read more. [Image: National Media Research Planning & Placement]

Who knew that Democrats love Extreme Makeover: Home Edition?

  1. trendhub reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. shalandavillage40 reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. kendrasite98 reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. primuscapio reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. donnellalexander reblogged this from untitled-mag
  6. yamelcakes reblogged this from okorogariist
  7. okorogariist reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. leftistshuffle reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. theluciusfox reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. crocodileblackpelvis reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. ajilivizion reblogged this from theatlantic
  12. wizardblue reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. trashpoetics reblogged this from theatlantic
  14. greggyour reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. untitled-mag reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. catincolorado reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    JUST LIKE TARGET KNOWING WHEN YOU ARE PREGNANT
  17. theelectricsnowshow reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    um, me? Get your thumbs out of your ears and start listening, folks! Wait, nevermind. We’re too far in….
  18. browngurlwfro reblogged this from nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident
  19. nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Bones skew Republican? Dancing with the Stars (of Bristol Palin infamy) skews Democratic?
  20. kevindrakewriter reblogged this from rabidchild and added:
    Holy shit, but the TV shows don’t surprise me.
  21. schaudwen reblogged this from upsettingshorts and added:
    OH THANK GOD. I’m not the only Blue who likes Friday Night Smackdown…
  22. agooddaytowhy reblogged this from rabidchild
  23. frivolessismore reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Very cool and very creepy. But 2.5 Men skews D? Color me surprised (and confused)
  24. williamrodick reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Michelob Ultra - the conservative conservative’s beer!
  25. lynnsanity214 reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    THIS IS SO COOL.
  26. herbisbored reblogged this from theatlantic
  27. organiccompounds reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  28. buddhassecret reblogged this from theatlantic
  29. spydrz said: Damn. I don’t watch any of those shows.
  30. thedrinkinggeek reblogged this from reafan