August 7, 2012
Pareidolia: A Bizarre Bug of the Human Mind Emerges in Computers

This rocky hill in Ebihens, France, is, well, just that — a rocky hill in Ebihens, France. But to pretty much any human observer, the assemblage of meaningless angles takes on a familiar appearance, that of a human face in profile. It has a distinct nose, eyes, lips, and chin, capped off with some foliage as hair. From the perspective pictured above, it’s impossible not to see a man in a mountain.
This is an example of a phenomenon known as pareidolia, the human tendency to read significance into random or vague stimuli (both visual and auditory). […]
Humans are not alone in their quest to “see” human faces in the sea of visual cues that surrounds them. For decades, scientists have been training computers to do the same. And, like humans, computers display pareidolia. 
Though there is something basely human about the tendency to see faces in the non-human shapes around us, to anthropomorphize odd pieces of hardware or rocks on a hillside, that computers see humans where there are none should not be all too surprising. Facial-recognition software is a tough technological feat, and in the process, computers are bound to come up with false positives. Does this make the computers more like us? Have they taken on our most human cognitive errors? In a superficial sense, yes, computers do make errors that are similar to pareidolia, and this seems very human. But as you look into these computer false-positives a bit more, you find a different story.

Read more. [Image: Wikimedia Commons]

Pareidolia: A Bizarre Bug of the Human Mind Emerges in Computers

This rocky hill in Ebihens, France, is, well, just that — a rocky hill in Ebihens, France. But to pretty much any human observer, the assemblage of meaningless angles takes on a familiar appearance, that of a human face in profile. It has a distinct nose, eyes, lips, and chin, capped off with some foliage as hair. From the perspective pictured above, it’s impossible not to see a man in a mountain.

This is an example of a phenomenon known as pareidolia, the human tendency to read significance into random or vague stimuli (both visual and auditory). […]

Humans are not alone in their quest to “see” human faces in the sea of visual cues that surrounds them. For decades, scientists have been training computers to do the same. And, like humans, computers display pareidolia. 

Though there is something basely human about the tendency to see faces in the non-human shapes around us, to anthropomorphize odd pieces of hardware or rocks on a hillside, that computers see humans where there are none should not be all too surprising. Facial-recognition software is a tough technological feat, and in the process, computers are bound to come up with false positives. Does this make the computers more like us? Have they taken on our most human cognitive errors? In a superficial sense, yes, computers do make errors that are similar to pareidolia, and this seems very human. But as you look into these computer false-positives a bit more, you find a different story.

Read more. [Image: Wikimedia Commons]

  1. likeasnowstorm reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. whenlifefindsyoudreaming reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. iam2conflicted reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. ashley9795 reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. spatialinterest reblogged this from theatlantic
  6. glitterandg-o-l-d reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. mojoxjojox420 reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. noneedforbloodpressure reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. c-rl-r-i-s reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. artoverwhelms reblogged this from mentalalchemy
  11. wildflowering reblogged this from homohegemony
  12. homohegemony reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. the-chena reblogged this from wargilbert
  14. drygrasses reblogged this from fallingivy
  15. disjunkt reblogged this from fallingivy
  16. fallingivy reblogged this from feministsbakecupcakestoo
  17. feministsbakecupcakestoo reblogged this from somuchscience
  18. somuchscience reblogged this from dendroica
  19. mauve-moth reblogged this from theatlantic
  20. self-synthesis reblogged this from polymath4ever
  21. multithreaded reblogged this from swanblood
  22. paviche reblogged this from somethingfeline
  23. somethingfeline reblogged this from swanblood
  24. slow-motion-shadow reblogged this from swanblood and added:
    I’m just interested in the fact that computers are developing the same thing. :D
  25. shatterpointcollective reblogged this from swanblood
  26. whoisjessicagrace reblogged this from dreamsofjade
  27. dreamsofjade reblogged this from swanblood