November 5, 2012
No One in America Should Have to Wait 7 Hours to Vote

No matter who wins the presidential race, no matter which party controls Congress, can we at least agree as reasonable adults that when it comes to voting itself the election of 2012 is a national disgrace? We ask our sons and daughters, our husbands and wives, to give their lives abroad for noble concepts like “freedom” and “democracy.” And yet we are content as a nation, and as a people, to tolerate another cycle of election rules that require our fellow citizens to sacrifice a measure of basic human dignity simply to exercise their right to vote. […]
This is happening not because of a natural disaster or breakdown in machinery. It is happening by partisan design. Alarmed by the strong Democratic turnout in early voting in 2008, Republican lawmakers, including Governor Rick Scott, reduced the number of early voting days from 14 to eight. When the restrictions were challenged in federal court under the Voting Rights Act, a three-judge panel said they would have a discriminatory impact upon minority voters. But only five of the state’s 67 counties are covered by the federal civil rights law.

Read more. [Image: Michael Finnegan/Twitter]

No One in America Should Have to Wait 7 Hours to Vote

No matter who wins the presidential race, no matter which party controls Congress, can we at least agree as reasonable adults that when it comes to voting itself the election of 2012 is a national disgrace? We ask our sons and daughters, our husbands and wives, to give their lives abroad for noble concepts like “freedom” and “democracy.” And yet we are content as a nation, and as a people, to tolerate another cycle of election rules that require our fellow citizens to sacrifice a measure of basic human dignity simply to exercise their right to vote. […]

This is happening not because of a natural disaster or breakdown in machinery. It is happening by partisan design. Alarmed by the strong Democratic turnout in early voting in 2008, Republican lawmakers, including Governor Rick Scott, reduced the number of early voting days from 14 to eight. When the restrictions were challenged in federal court under the Voting Rights Act, a three-judge panel said they would have a discriminatory impact upon minority voters. But only five of the state’s 67 counties are covered by the federal civil rights law.

Read more. [Image: Michael Finnegan/Twitter]

  1. newzat10 reblogged this from disciplesofmalcolm
  2. valjean-rising reblogged this from expatlibrarian
  3. pod313 reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. suzifgarcia reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    There are 0 early voting days in Michigan. Ridiculous. Also, why isn’t it a fucking holiday already??
  5. monstertesk reblogged this from disciplesofmalcolm
  6. disciplesofmalcolm reblogged this from sinidentidades
  7. oparnoshoshoi reblogged this from digatisdi and added:
    Out of curiosity, how does fewer early voting days specifically affect minorities? This seems to make as much sense as...
  8. swimmingreenhen reblogged this from digatisdi
  9. soilrockslove reblogged this from digatisdi
  10. trotskitty reblogged this from sinidentidades
  11. sinidentidades reblogged this from digatisdi
  12. digatisdi reblogged this from moniquill
  13. thecakeis reblogged this from theatlantic
  14. jjarichardson reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. theoldwalkingsong reblogged this from wilwheaton
  16. wunderrbar reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    No matter who wins the presidential race, no matter which party controls Congress, can we at least agree as reasonable...
  17. synergicsymphonic reblogged this from psuedofolio
  18. mistywinds32 reblogged this from theatlantic
  19. epilepticbliss reblogged this from tsarcasm
  20. aknightwithyou reblogged this from wilwheaton
  21. eowfang reblogged this from theatlantic