January 17, 2013

Why We Shouldn’t Mock the Idea of an Eiffel Tower in Hangzhou

Architects and critics within and beyond China have treated these derivative designs with scorn, as shameless kitsch or simply trash. Others cite China’s larger knock-off culture, from handbags to housing, as evidence of the innovation gap between China and the United States. For a larger audience on the Internet, they are merely a punchline, another example of China’s endlessly entertaining wackiness.

In short, the majority of Chinese architectural imitation, oozing with historical romanticism, is not taken seriously.

But perhaps it ought to be.

See more. [Images: Bianca Bosker]

  1. squalorsandsmoke reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. etherealimbue reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. annethecaptain reblogged this from everyhopeanycost
  4. everyhopeanycost reblogged this from iwantcupcakes
  5. jryork reblogged this from theatlantic
  6. kinkypinkfemboislut reblogged this from iwantcupcakes and added:
    God, they think *THAT’s* British architecture? My God! Have they not seen Blenhim Place?
  7. shang-hi reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. wizardblue reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. crazylittlethingcalledlovemb reblogged this from iwantcupcakes and added:
    it really has no point to copy historical monuments because they have, in fact, history. I mean, what’s the point of...
  10. drmccool reblogged this from iwantcupcakes
  11. neue-haas-grotesk reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    ALL OF MY FAVORITE THINGS IN ONE!
  12. aroundthecockgirl reblogged this from dirtyasianbidness and added:
    Our summer vacation
  13. realist-idealist reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Great article.
  14. teamanthro reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. timovdrow reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. god--made--man reblogged this from theatlantic
  17. dying-inside-4ever reblogged this from theatlantic