July 11, 2013
There’s No Republican Party—There Are 5 of Them

Across the nation, not just in Washington, there are ever more signs of a Republican Party veering to the right edge of the right wing of the political spectrum. With prospects for a comprehensive immigration bill fading, what will it take to bring the GOP back at least to the right edge of the center of the spectrum, to compete to win national elections on its own merits and not just when the Democrats fail or the economy falters?

American history has many examples of a party going off the rails and taking a long time to recover. It was true of the Democrats in the 1890s and again in the 1960s and early ’70s. One rough rule of thumb is that a party has to lose three presidential elections in a row to make it clear that the problem is not just individual presidential candidates and their failures but something deeper, enough to motivate a party to move to expand beyond its ideological base and capture the center. But if that happens in 2016 — if Democrats make it three wins in a row — I am not sure it will be enough for the GOP.
That is because I see at least five Republican parties out there, with a lot of overlap, but with enough distinct differences that the task is harder than usual. There is a House party, a Senate party, and a presidential party, of course. But there is also a Southern party and a non-Southern one.
Read more. [Image: Reuters]

There’s No Republican Party—There Are 5 of Them

Across the nation, not just in Washington, there are ever more signs of a Republican Party veering to the right edge of the right wing of the political spectrum. With prospects for a comprehensive immigration bill fading, what will it take to bring the GOP back at least to the right edge of the center of the spectrum, to compete to win national elections on its own merits and not just when the Democrats fail or the economy falters?

American history has many examples of a party going off the rails and taking a long time to recover. It was true of the Democrats in the 1890s and again in the 1960s and early ’70s. One rough rule of thumb is that a party has to lose three presidential elections in a row to make it clear that the problem is not just individual presidential candidates and their failures but something deeper, enough to motivate a party to move to expand beyond its ideological base and capture the center. But if that happens in 2016 — if Democrats make it three wins in a row — I am not sure it will be enough for the GOP.

That is because I see at least five Republican parties out there, with a lot of overlap, but with enough distinct differences that the task is harder than usual. There is a House party, a Senate party, and a presidential party, of course. But there is also a Southern party and a non-Southern one.

Read more. [Image: Reuters]

1:17pm
  
Filed under: Politics Republican Party GOP 
  1. truthisabsolution reblogged this from political-fanatic
  2. political-fanatic reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. feministbecky reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  4. spartanninja reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  5. m011ip0p reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  6. freshandtrill reblogged this from adorablenarcissist
  7. candiedcastigation reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  8. adorablenarcissist reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  9. boobytrapzap reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  10. fix-denied reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  11. rabbleprochoice reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  12. expensiveicecream reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. therealsabolish reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  14. tansytum reblogged this from cognitivedissonance
  15. up4consideration reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. luckyclive reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  17. themadness-vase reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  18. ofthelumi reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  19. citizen73 reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  20. haveagoodaisy reblogged this from irrationalliberal
  21. irrationalliberal reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  22. recall-all-republicans reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  23. donniewho reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  24. politisnap reblogged this from theatlantic