July 16, 2013
Why Do People Like Superheroes? Don’t Ask a Psychologist

Comics Journal writer Tom Crippen titled an essay about Superman “The Big Dumb Dream.” It’s funny because it’s true: Superman, and the superheroes that followed him, are, as dreams go, big and dumb. There’s a kind of genius to that bigness and dumbness. If people like strong, powerful heroes, why not create a hero who is exponentially stronger and more powerful than any hero ever seen before? But the genius is also the genius of the lowest-common-denominator panderer. Siegel and Shuster, Superman’s creators, figured out exactly what big, dumb thing the public wanted—and the rest is history.
Why does the public want that big, dumb thing, though? That’s a worthwhile question, and one you would think that a book titled Our Superheroes, Ourselves might set itself to answer. Edited by Robin S. Rosenberg, the volume is, as the intro says, “a collection of essays by noted psychologists in which the authors apply their knowledge of psychology to our relationship to superheroes, and to the extent to which superheroes’ psychological nature reflects human nature.”
This seems like a reasonable approach and a reasonable goal. And yet, somewhere along the way, most of the essays in the book go wrong. Whether criticizing superhero narratives or extolling them, the psychologists here seem to have trouble articulating why they’re focused on superheroes in particular, rather than on pop culture in general, or even on something else entirely.
Read more. [Image: WB]

Why Do People Like Superheroes? Don’t Ask a Psychologist

Comics Journal writer Tom Crippen titled an essay about Superman “The Big Dumb Dream.” It’s funny because it’s true: Superman, and the superheroes that followed him, are, as dreams go, big and dumb. There’s a kind of genius to that bigness and dumbness. If people like strong, powerful heroes, why not create a hero who is exponentially stronger and more powerful than any hero ever seen before? But the genius is also the genius of the lowest-common-denominator panderer. Siegel and Shuster, Superman’s creators, figured out exactly what big, dumb thing the public wanted—and the rest is history.

Why does the public want that big, dumb thing, though? That’s a worthwhile question, and one you would think that a book titled Our Superheroes, Ourselves might set itself to answer. Edited by Robin S. Rosenberg, the volume is, as the intro says, “a collection of essays by noted psychologists in which the authors apply their knowledge of psychology to our relationship to superheroes, and to the extent to which superheroes’ psychological nature reflects human nature.”

This seems like a reasonable approach and a reasonable goal. And yet, somewhere along the way, most of the essays in the book go wrong. Whether criticizing superhero narratives or extolling them, the psychologists here seem to have trouble articulating why they’re focused on superheroes in particular, rather than on pop culture in general, or even on something else entirely.

Read more. [Image: WB]

  1. welcometotheoutlands reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. arguei reblogged this from fuckyeahsuperheroines
  3. niesenn reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. maddyk77 reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. benedictusantonius reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Psycology, “science” at its finest.
  6. sandunicorn reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. shoes-that-cut-eyes-that-burn reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. letsbehope reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. cafairchild reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. theempresscard reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. nadanuevobajoel-sol reblogged this from theatlantic
  12. zoenne reblogged this from fuckyeahsuperheroines