September 23, 2013
Let’s Abolish the Emmys: A Brave Idea from 1956

Last night’s presentation of the 65th annual Emmy Awards was, according to the Internet at large, a bust.
The ceremony was boring; the jokes weren’t funny; the wrong people won the awards. “Nobody ever gets one of these three-hour statuette dispensaries completely right,” wrote The Washington Post’s Hank Stuever, but this year’s Emmys “poked along as flatly as possible. The banter had no flair for comedy.” Host Neil Patrick Harris’s opening monologue was “the peak embodiment of ‘giving people exactly what they do not want,’” wrote The Daily Beast’s Kevin Fallon, and after Jeff Daniels shocked TV audiences by beating the likes of Jon Hamm, Kevin Spacey, and Bryan Cranston in the Best Actor in a Drama Series race for his role in The Newsroom, one deadpan headline on The Atlantic Wire read, “The Internet Is Mad Jeff Daniels Won Best Actor.”
“An awards show filled with skits about how bad awards shows are gave awards to people who talked about how bad the show turned out, while everyone on Twitter had decided that hours earlier,” Stuever concluded. “These days, that’s entertainment.” To recap: The Emmys this year were a surprising low in bad awards shows, even for an awards show that understands how bad awards shows are.
So here’s a brave, radical solution that’s all of 57 years old: Let’s just give up on the Emmys entirely.
In 1956, Stuart W. Hyde strongly believed that the Emmys were inherently terrible and wrote an article about it for The Quarterly of Film Radio and Television titled “Another Look at the Emmy Awards.” Hyde (then an assistant professor of telecommunications at the University of Southern California, who would later go on to write the popular textbook Television and Radio Announcing) argued that the Emmys, just seven years old at the time, were failing to live up to their own lofty goals and were instead destroying the ambitions of the creators who would drive television forward by arbitrarily anointing one TV program the “best.” In place of the Emmys, Hyde suggested, America needed a weeklong festival of TV watching.
Read more. [Image: Invision for Academy of Television Arts & Sciences / AP / Phil McCarten]

Let’s Abolish the Emmys: A Brave Idea from 1956

Last night’s presentation of the 65th annual Emmy Awards was, according to the Internet at large, a bust.

The ceremony was boring; the jokes weren’t funny; the wrong people won the awards. “Nobody ever gets one of these three-hour statuette dispensaries completely right,” wrote The Washington Post’s Hank Stuever, but this year’s Emmys “poked along as flatly as possible. The banter had no flair for comedy.” Host Neil Patrick Harris’s opening monologue was “the peak embodiment of ‘giving people exactly what they do not want,’” wrote The Daily Beast’s Kevin Fallon, and after Jeff Daniels shocked TV audiences by beating the likes of Jon Hamm, Kevin Spacey, and Bryan Cranston in the Best Actor in a Drama Series race for his role in The Newsroom, one deadpan headline on The Atlantic Wire read, “The Internet Is Mad Jeff Daniels Won Best Actor.”

“An awards show filled with skits about how bad awards shows are gave awards to people who talked about how bad the show turned out, while everyone on Twitter had decided that hours earlier,” Stuever concluded. “These days, that’s entertainment.” To recap: The Emmys this year were a surprising low in bad awards shows, even for an awards show that understands how bad awards shows are.

So here’s a brave, radical solution that’s all of 57 years old: Let’s just give up on the Emmys entirely.

In 1956, Stuart W. Hyde strongly believed that the Emmys were inherently terrible and wrote an article about it for The Quarterly of Film Radio and Television titled “Another Look at the Emmy Awards.” Hyde (then an assistant professor of telecommunications at the University of Southern California, who would later go on to write the popular textbook Television and Radio Announcing) argued that the Emmys, just seven years old at the time, were failing to live up to their own lofty goals and were instead destroying the ambitions of the creators who would drive television forward by arbitrarily anointing one TV program the “best.” In place of the Emmys, Hyde suggested, America needed a weeklong festival of TV watching.

Read more. [Image: Invision for Academy of Television Arts & Sciences / AP / Phil McCarten]

12:25pm
  
Filed under: Television Emmys The Emmys 
  1. kammartinez reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. mclain09 reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. tauycreek reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Part of the problem with the Emmys are the lack of choices. Unlike the Oscars where the nominees change every year, the...
  4. sandunicorn reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. sandunicorn said: The Emmys were almost painfully BORING! —and the wrong people won! What the?!? The only redeeming moment was when Breaking Bad won for Best Drama—FINALLY! Otherwise, what a complete waste of time!
  6. angryoldlady reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. carpetcrawler reblogged this from broadcastarchive-umd
  8. mrarchivist reblogged this from broadcastarchive-umd and added:
    Yep. This.
  9. broadcastarchive-umd reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Let’s Abolish the Emmys: A Brave Idea from 1956
  10. agoetze reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. the-electric-boogaloo reblogged this from theatlantic
  12. classring52 reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. laracroftsspouse reblogged this from wethinktherefore
  14. trxsxrms reblogged this from wethinktherefore
  15. aleams reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. chal9 reblogged this from theatlantic
  17. ltvaroha reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Interesting idea
  18. are-we-dreaming reblogged this from theatlantic
  19. depasadita reblogged this from theatlantic
  20. wonderfullynerdy reblogged this from furtherreview
  21. like-a-redwhisker reblogged this from thisisarock
  22. legacyphoenix reblogged this from theatlantic
  23. thisisarock reblogged this from consultingdetectiveininaba