September 24, 2013
The Case for Banning Internet Commenters

I’ve heard comment sections compared to “sewers”, and that sounds rather literally correct. Most of them are logistically required, but consistently disgusting, subterranean conduits for what is, technically speaking, waste. Not The Atlantic, of course. We have the Internet’s best commenters. But, you know, other people’s websites.
If you have ever visited YouTube, you cannot pretend to not know what I’m talking about.
So this got me thinking: Popular Science has officially shut off its comment section, pointing to research showing that disagreeable comments hurt the reading experience. Or, at least, the reading comprehension. One study out of the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that mean comments under an article about nanotechnology “polarized readers,” taking attention away from the story and warping the audience’s grasp of the article. Another study found that even simple disagreements between commenters “impacted readers’ perception of science,” wrote Suzanne LaBarre, PopSci's online content director.
Read more.

The Case for Banning Internet Commenters

I’ve heard comment sections compared to “sewers”, and that sounds rather literally correct. Most of them are logistically required, but consistently disgusting, subterranean conduits for what is, technically speaking, waste. Not The Atlantic, of course. We have the Internet’s best commenters. But, you know, other people’s websites.

If you have ever visited YouTube, you cannot pretend to not know what I’m talking about.

So this got me thinking: Popular Science has officially shut off its comment section, pointing to research showing that disagreeable comments hurt the reading experience. Or, at least, the reading comprehension. One study out of the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that mean comments under an article about nanotechnology “polarized readers,” taking attention away from the story and warping the audience’s grasp of the article. Another study found that even simple disagreements between commenters “impacted readers’ perception of science,” wrote Suzanne LaBarre, PopSci's online content director.

Read more.

  1. moduloone reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. carlafranklin reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    The Case for Banning Internet Commenters I’ve heard comment sections compared to “sewers”, and that sounds rather...
  3. mrs-excess reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. crack-in-the-teacup reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. lbelle1 reblogged this from buck4itt
  6. buck4itt reblogged this from oldguysrule
  7. mousymo reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. awalkerposts reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. kamcalste reblogged this from astro-stoner
  10. taoduck reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. carlinsolutions reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    The Case for Banning Internet Commenters I’ve heard comment sections compared to “sewers”, and that sounds rather...
  12. intertekstualisht reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. prnewswire reblogged this from theatlantic
  14. lessonforguitar reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. rosemartin321 reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. digitalmediamarketing2014 reblogged this from theatlantic
  17. jusbecoz reblogged this from theatlantic
  18. katcooo reblogged this from theatlantic
  19. theliberaltony reblogged this from theatlantic
  20. judgemental-cat reblogged this from theatlantic
  21. iamgbtm reblogged this from astro-stoner
  22. astro-stoner reblogged this from theatlantic
  23. tanya77 reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Jesus, I’m totally for this. (As I post a comment. Seriously, though, I’m for this.)
  24. umbreenatstanford reblogged this from theatlantic