October 24, 2013
The Battle for Power on the Internet

We’re in the middle of an epic battle for power in cyberspace. On one side are the traditional, organized, institutional powers such as governments and large multinational corporations. On the other are the distributed and nimble: grassroots movements, dissident groups, hackers, and criminals. Initially, the Internet empowered the second side. It gave them a place to coordinate and communicate efficiently, and made them seem unbeatable. But now, the more traditional institutional powers are winning, and winning big. How these two side fare in the long term, and the fate of the rest of us who don’t fall into either group, is an open question—and one vitally important to the future of the Internet.

In the Internet’s early days, there was a lot of talk about its “natural laws”—how it would upend traditional power blocks, empower the masses, and spread freedom throughout the world. The international nature of the Internet bypassed circumvented national laws. Anonymity was easy. Censorship was impossible. Police were clueless about cybercrime. And bigger changes seemed inevitable. Digital cash would undermine national sovereignty. Citizen journalism would topple traditional media, corporate PR, and political parties. Easy digital copying would destroy the traditional movie and music industries. Web marketing would allow even the smallest companies to compete against corporate giants. It really would be a new world order.
This was a utopian vision, but some of it did come to pass.
Read more. [Image: Vivek Prakash/Reuters]

The Battle for Power on the Internet

We’re in the middle of an epic battle for power in cyberspace. On one side are the traditional, organized, institutional powers such as governments and large multinational corporations. On the other are the distributed and nimble: grassroots movements, dissident groups, hackers, and criminals. Initially, the Internet empowered the second side. It gave them a place to coordinate and communicate efficiently, and made them seem unbeatable. But now, the more traditional institutional powers are winning, and winning big. How these two side fare in the long term, and the fate of the rest of us who don’t fall into either group, is an open question—and one vitally important to the future of the Internet.

In the Internet’s early days, there was a lot of talk about its “natural laws”—how it would upend traditional power blocks, empower the masses, and spread freedom throughout the world. The international nature of the Internet bypassed circumvented national laws. Anonymity was easy. Censorship was impossible. Police were clueless about cybercrime. And bigger changes seemed inevitable. Digital cash would undermine national sovereignty. Citizen journalism would topple traditional media, corporate PR, and political parties. Easy digital copying would destroy the traditional movie and music industries. Web marketing would allow even the smallest companies to compete against corporate giants. It really would be a new world order.

This was a utopian vision, but some of it did come to pass.

Read more. [Image: Vivek Prakash/Reuters]

  1. letscensorthis reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. freecyberspace reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. sama-el reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. parental-censorship reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. darnyous reblogged this from theatlantic
  6. classring52 reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. miu15 reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. boffeecite reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. hackos reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. m4dr4ss reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. fuck-culture reblogged this from megacosms
  12. esaspequenasnaderias reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. intljones reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    The Battle for Power on the Internet We’re in the middle of an epic battle for power in cyberspace. On one side are the...
  14. iamvictoriaanne reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. nowayne reblogged this from tokintaoist
  16. scottak reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    *has not yet
  17. maplebrownsugar reblogged this from shamefullyinspired
  18. rossofunny reblogged this from levidepapier
  19. cpnfabulous reblogged this from theatlantic
  20. paraplegicblues reblogged this from theatlantic
  21. brenardo reblogged this from theatlantic
  22. based-god-saved-my-life reblogged this from moretothepicturethanmeetstheeye