January 7, 2014
Why You Should Forget About the Poverty Rate

If you want to appreciate just how much progress America has made fighting poverty since Lyndon Johnson declared his war on it 50 years ago this week, here’s a tip: Forget the official poverty rate. 
Well, don’t forget it entirely. But do understand its limits. In 1964, the rate was 19 percent. Today, it’s 15 percent, which, as my colleague Derek Thompson wrote yesterday, suggests we’ve barely made a dent in economic deprivation. But for such an influential and obsessed-over number, there’s widespread agreement that the government’s standard poverty measure is deeply flawed, and it almost certainly understates how much the social safety net has improved U.S. living standards over time.
In other words, there are lies, damn lies, and in this case, outdated economic statistics. 
Read more. [Image: Reuters]

Why You Should Forget About the Poverty Rate

If you want to appreciate just how much progress America has made fighting poverty since Lyndon Johnson declared his war on it 50 years ago this week, here’s a tip: Forget the official poverty rate. 

Well, don’t forget it entirely. But do understand its limits. In 1964, the rate was 19 percent. Today, it’s 15 percent, which, as my colleague Derek Thompson wrote yesterday, suggests we’ve barely made a dent in economic deprivation. But for such an influential and obsessed-over number, there’s widespread agreement that the government’s standard poverty measure is deeply flawed, and it almost certainly understates how much the social safety net has improved U.S. living standards over time.

In other words, there are lies, damn lies, and in this case, outdated economic statistics.

Read more. [Image: Reuters]

  1. ta1987 reblogged this from political-fanatic
  2. political-fanatic reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. justwinraiders reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. drhodgins reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. aboriginalnewswire reblogged this from theatlantic
  6. secondsphinxter reblogged this from kattrieze
  7. anindiscriminatecollection reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. konkretejungle reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. pod313 reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. biggestbossuveseenthusfar reblogged this from anjunapaisa
  11. sosungalittleclodofclay reblogged this from theatlantic
  12. photoimagining reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. parmodule reblogged this from theatlantic
  14. verbish reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. thingsmybestfriendmightlike reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. mdouble said: poverty is in part state of mind, not a specific figure. For example, a monk may own nothing and so with no tangible assets is by definition below the official poverty line. But the monk may also be blissfully happy having disassociated themselves from the dictates of…
  17. bisabuelo reblogged this from theatlantic
  18. rubencampos reblogged this from theatlantic
  19. a-new-strange-world reblogged this from verycuriousnocure
  20. bilalnedman reblogged this from theatlantic
  21. skipandrave reblogged this from theatlantic
  22. verycuriousnocure reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    IMO, even though Lyndon Johnson had the best of intentions back in 1964, his goals are far from being achieved.....