March 19, 2014
'One of the Greatest Discoveries in the History of Science' Hasn't Been Peer-Reviewed. Does It Matter?

Big scientific discoveries—the kind that shift our view of the world and our place within it—don’t come along very often. 
This week, though, one did. 

New data seem to offer, for the first time, direct evidence of the entities Einstein predicted in his general theory of relativity: gravitational waves. Which is a finding that, if it holds up, sheds new light on nothing less than the origins of the universe. The discovery is, according to one expert, “an amazing achievement.” It is also, according to another, “one of the greatest discoveries in the history of science”—“a sensational breakthrough involving not only our cosmic origins, but also the nature of space.”
So, basically: This is big, you guys! Einstein big! Nature-of-space big! Big Bang-big!
There’s just one small thing, though. The findings shared this week also share a significant caveat: They haven’t yet been peer-reviewed. They are discoveries that are, as far as scientific institutionalism is concerned, provisional. They’re stuck in a kind of epistemological limbo—as information that has not yet been converted into fact, and data that have not yet been codified into knowledge. Official status: truthy.
Read more. [Image: Reuters]

'One of the Greatest Discoveries in the History of Science' Hasn't Been Peer-Reviewed. Does It Matter?

Big scientific discoveries—the kind that shift our view of the world and our place within it—don’t come along very often.

This week, though, one did.

New data seem to offer, for the first time, direct evidence of the entities Einstein predicted in his general theory of relativity: gravitational waves. Which is a finding that, if it holds up, sheds new light on nothing less than the origins of the universe. The discovery is, according to one expert, “an amazing achievement.” It is also, according to another, “one of the greatest discoveries in the history of science”—“a sensational breakthrough involving not only our cosmic origins, but also the nature of space.”

So, basically: This is big, you guys! Einstein big! Nature-of-space big! Big Bang-big!

There’s just one small thing, though. The findings shared this week also share a significant caveat: They haven’t yet been peer-reviewed. They are discoveries that are, as far as scientific institutionalism is concerned, provisional. They’re stuck in a kind of epistemological limbo—as information that has not yet been converted into fact, and data that have not yet been codified into knowledge. Official status: truthy.

Read more. [Image: Reuters]

  1. readitsomeplace reblogged this from randomness-from-thisoldguy
  2. the-smiling-skyscraper reblogged this from multiverseofawesomeness
  3. multiverseofawesomeness reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. je-il reblogged this from laboratoryequipment
  5. subliminaltwist reblogged this from afro-dominicano
  6. sliverdemon reblogged this from maneatingbadger
  7. maneatingbadger reblogged this from joleebindo
  8. nukenate reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. pandora2000 reblogged this from house-of-gnar
  10. vanesa reblogged this from mucholderthen
  11. frozenherring reblogged this from laboratoryequipment
  12. daisydoestoast reblogged this from jamestiberiusperfhair
  13. organiccompounds reblogged this from starstuffblog
  14. itsadreamersworld reblogged this from starstuffblog
  15. vurige-ziel reblogged this from starstuffblog
  16. starstuffblog reblogged this from laboratoryequipment
  17. burntjellytoast reblogged this from laboratoryequipment
  18. texasdreamer01 reblogged this from laboratoryequipment
  19. cat-dracula reblogged this from emilyshka
  20. emilyshka reblogged this from austenvbronte
  21. lovearixx reblogged this from jdwoods2
  22. triplec95 reblogged this from laboratoryequipment
  23. aunttoni556 reblogged this from house-of-gnar
  24. noirman reblogged this from laboratoryequipment